note

raunch culture

regarding: 
Female Chauvinist Pigs

raunch culture and the pornification of america:
-- stripper aerobics classes
-- prevalence of "brazilian" waxing
-- prevalence of thongs and other fashion that was formerly reserved for strippers / sex workers
-- playboy bunny symbol adopted by women
-- porn stars moving into "mainstream" interviews and music videos
-- pop stars openly displaying accepting Girls Gone Wild / etc
-- incorporation of "girls gone wild" into the vernacular
-- the "man show" and the rise of maxim, fhm, stuff

-- charlie's angels remake: "its stars, who kept talking about 'strong women' and 'empowerment,' were dressed in alternating soft-port styles-- as massage parlor geishas, dominatrixes, yodeling Heidis in alpine bustiers. in the sequel, they were required to perform stripteases for a mission.

chapter 1:
joe francis, founder of GGW, "these flashing girls are like the seventies feminists burning their bras."

"it sounds like a fantasy world dreamed up by teenage boys. a world of sun and san where frozen daiquiris flow from faucets and any hot girl you see will peel off her bikini top, lift up her skirt...all you have to do is ask. it's no surprise that there's a male audience for this, but what's strange is that the women who populate this alternate reality are not strippers or paid performers, they are middle-class college kids on vacation-- they are mainstream. and really, their reality is not all that unusual. people on spring break are obviously young, and horn was right to call the flashing a rite of passage. but it is an initiation into something ongoing rather than a one-shot deal, more like having a first beer than a bat mitzvah.... girls gone wild is not extraordinary, it's emblematic.

-- the influence of jenna jameson
-- female olympic athletes appeared naked or next to naked in playboy and FHM. positions photographed are referred to "presenting" when seen in the animal kingdom. "the collective effect of these pictures of hot (and, in most cases, wet) girls with thighs parted, tiny, porny patches of pubic hair, and coy, naughty-girl pouts made it almost impossible to keep sight of the women's awesome physical gifts. but then, that may have been the point: bimbos enjoy a higher standing in our culture than olympians right now. perhaps the athletes felt they were trading up."

-- strippers not symbolize sexual liberation despite the fact that it is thei job to *fake* arousal.
-- the bachelor, who wants to marry a millionaire?, joe millionaire, etc = "harem-themed?"
-- may 2004 FHM: cast members of the apprentice appeared in underwear for free.
-- rise of plastic surgeries including "vaginoplasty"

"this is our establishment, these are our role models, this is high fashion and low culture, this is athletics and politics, this is television and publishing and pop music and medicine and--good news!- being a part of it makes you a strong, powerful woman. because we have determined that all empowered women must be overtly and publicly sexual, and because the only sign of sexuality we seem to be able to recognize is a direct allusion to red-light entertainment, we have laced the sleazy energy and aesthetic of a topless club or a penthouse shoot throughout our entire culture."

"...everyone who is sexually liberated ought to be imitating strippers and porn stars."

porn used to be something someone had to recover from. ex: vanessa williams as miss america and her nude photos in penthouse.

now, consider that no one really knew who paris hilton was until her sex tape started to circulate. now she's one of the most recognizable and marketable female celebrities.

interesting irony: divorce rate in bible belt is roughly 50% higher than the rest of the country. in conservative greater atlanta, 58% of voters cast their ballot for bush and desperate housewives was the number one show. playboy is far more popular in conservative wyoming than in liberal new york.

important to note: "raunch culture is not essentially progressive, it is essentially commercial. by going to strip clubs and flashing on spring break and ogling our olympians in playboy, it's not as though we are embracing something liberal-- this isn't Free Love. raunch culture isn't about opening our minds to the possibilities and mysteries of sexuality. it's about endlessly reiterating one particular-- and particularly commercial--shorthand for sexiness.

"...our interest is in the appearance of sexiness, not the existence of sexual pleasure. before paris hilton we had britney spears and jessica simson to drool over: two shiny, waxy blondes who used to tell us over and over again that sex was something they sang about, not something they actually engaged in."

christie hefner-- "a lot of women read the magazine. this is proof that the post-sexual revolution, post-women's movement generation that is now out there in their late twenties and early thirties-- and then it continues with the generation behind them, too--has just a more grown-up, comfortable, natural attitude about sex and sexines that is more in line with where guys were a couple generations before. the rabbit head symbolizes sexy fun, a little bit of rebelliousness, the same way a navel ring does... or low-rider jeans! it's an obvious 'I'm taking control of how I look and the statement I'm making' as opposed to 'I'm embarrassed about it' or 'I'm uncomfortable with it.' a little bit of that in-your-face... but in a fun way...'frisky' is a good word."

hugh hefner and clashes with feminism:
"the rabbit, the bunny, in america has a sexual meaning, and I chose it because it's a freh anima, shy, vivacious, jumping--sexy. first it smells you, then it escapes, then it comes back, and you feel like caressing it, laying with it. a girl resembles a bunny. joyful, joking. consider the kind of girl that we made popular: the playmate of the month. she is never ophisticated, a girl you cannot really have. she is a young, healthy, simple girl-- the girl next door... we are not intereste in the mysterious, difficult woman, the femme fatale, who wears elegant underwear, with lace, and she is sad, and somehow mentally filthy. the playboy girl has no lace, no underwear, she is naked, well-washed with soap and water, and she is happy."
1967 to italian journalist oriana fallaci

"the playboy girls have a very high morality. if they accept a date, they lose their job. private detectives find out if they accept a date. women were meant to be ornamental entertainment, not partners in wildness, and their complicity-- their obedience-- was policed accordingly in the playboy empire.... 'I wouldn't like my daughter to have a promiscuous life. I would not like my daughter to be immoral.'"

"I do not look for equality between man and woman. I like innocent, affectionate, faithful girls. socially, mentally, I enjoy more being with men. when I want to speak, to think, I stay with men."

regarding uncle tom's cabin:
"...the converse strategy [from george harris] for coping with race in Stowe's text is the one that has become notorious, and it is, of course, the one exhibited by uncle tom. tom, remember, is a creation of stowe's who so thoroughly accepts his oppression as a slave, he renders the standard appurtenances of enslavement unnecessary. when a slave trader transports him for sale, tom can be left unshackled; there is no chance he will run away because he has so completely internalized the system of which he is a victim. he believes that he really is property, so to run away would be to rob his owner, a crime he wouldn't dream of committing."

"consequently, tom is thought of by his masters-- and by stowe herself-- as 'steady,' 'honest,' 'sensible,' and 'pious.' not only does tom submit to the system that oppresses him, he actively strives for the love of his oppressor, and oves him in return. george shelby, the man tom has served since his birth, is too ashamed to say good-bye to tom after he literally sels him down the river, thus separating tom from his wife, children, and home, and condemning him to a bleack and lethally brutal future. yet tom's wistful parting words as he is carted off to the auction block are, 'give my love to mas'r george.'"

"uncle tom has taken on a meaning very different from the one stowe intended. an uncle tom is a person who deliberately upholds the stereotypes assigned to his or her marginalized group in the interest of getting ahead with the dominant group."

james baldwin wrote, "we take our shape, it is true, within and against that cage of reality bequesathed us at our birth; and yet t is precisely through our dependence on this reality that we are most endlessly betrayed." the cage in which we "find ourselves bound, first without, then within," is the "nature of our categorization." we are defined and ultimately defin ourselves, baldwin argued, by the cultural meaning assigned to our broadest human details-- blackness, whiteness, maleness, femaleness, and so on.

"... there are parallels in the was we can think about the limits of what can be gained by 'acting like' an exalted group or reifying the stereotypes attributed to a subordinate group. these are the two strategies an FCP uses to deal with her femaleness: either acting like a cartoon man--who drools over strippers, says things like "check out that ass," and brags about having the "biggest cock in the building"-- or acting like a cartoon woman, who has big cartoon breasts, wears little cartoon outfits, and can only express her sexuality by spinning around a pole."

camille paglia regarding critics of her controversial views on date rape:
"they have this stupid, pathetic, completely removed-from-reality view of things that they've gotten from these academics who are totally off the wall, totally removed. whereas my views on sex are coming from the fact that I am a football fan and I am a rock fan. rock and football are revealing something true and permanent and eternal about male energy and sexuality. they are revealing the fact that womn, in fact, like the idea of flaunting, strutting, wild masculine energy. the people who criticize me, these establishment feminists, these white upper-middle-class feminists in new york, especially, who think of themselves as so literate, the kind of music they like, is, like suzanne vega-- you know, women's music."

levy's counter: "reducing 'women's music' to something soft and neutered, something guaranteed to make her--female!--interviewer say 'yuck,' is a manipulative little move. it's a way for paglia to separate herself from the human characteristics she finds most unattractive-- weakness, effeteness, pusillanimity-- and to make these things 'permanently and eternally' female. (which, by the way, paglia is.)"

"paglia's equation of al things aggressive, arrogant, adventurous, and libidinous with masculinity, and her relegation of everything whiney, wimpy, needy, and complacent to femininity, is, among other things, dopey. we have to wonder why a oman as crackling smart as camille paglia would be so unsophisticated in her conception of gender. we have to wonder why a woman as thoughtful as sheila nevins-- a woman whose entire career is based on the intrepid exploration of complex stories-- would have a knee-jerk reaction to a question that positioned her as a member of the female gender...
... instead of trying to reform other people's-- or her own-- perception of femininity, the Female Chauvinist Pig likes to position herself as something outside the normal bounds of womanhood. if defending her own little patch of turf requires denigrating other women--reducing them to 'yuck' as paglia does or airheads who prioritize manicures, or, judith regan's favorite, 'pussies'-- so be it."

"even if you are a woman who achieves the ultimate and becomes like a man you will still always be like a woman. and as long as womanhood is thought of as something to escape from, something less than manhood, you will be thought less of, too."

regarding "boi" lesbianism: "what's new is seeing these kid who really seem to be striving fo a certain kind of juenilia, not just masculinity. they really want to be kids. this hit me when I aw this girl--this boi, I guess-- barreling out of a store in chelsea in huge, oversize jeans, a backpack, and a baseball cap pulled down low. and she was running as if she were late for the school bus... her whole aura was so completely rough-and-tumble eight-year-old that I wouldn't have been surprised if she had a slingshot in one pocket and a frog in the other."

in 1939, new york city mayor fiorello la guardia insisted that the city's exotic dancers cover their genitals for the world's fair, and the thong was born to placate his decree while exposing the maximum amount of skin.

chapter 5

"these are not stories about girls getting what they want sexually, they are stories about girls gaining acclaim socially, for which their sexuality is a tool. while it would be 'weird' for a teen girl to pursue sexual gratification, it is crucial that she seem sexy--raunchy, willing, wild...."

"adolescents are not inventing this culture of exhibitionism and conformity with their own fledgling creative powers. teens are reflecting back our slobbering culture in miniature."

confusion of attention and affection. or attention and respect and value.

ex: "sex is something you did to fit in more than something you did for pleasure. 'it's an ego thing. we talk about it like at lunch on the patio; people think it's cool. it's competitive: who can hook up with the most guys and who can have sex, who can be the most... like my friend is having her eighteenth birthday party and she wants to have strippers there."

are girls focused more on what's expected of them than what they want?

we are pouring an enormous amount of money into abstinence-only education-- that is, sexual education that promote virginity and discredits or disregards contraception-- despite the fact that not a single study has shown this approach works. under the administration of george w. bush, annual funding of $168 million was allocated for fiscal year 2005 to three federal programs designed to promote abstinence-only education. (those are section 510 of the social security act, the teen pregnancy prevention section of the adolescent family life act, and the special projects of regional and national significance program.) in total, this country has spent nearly $1 billion on abstinence education since 1996.

alan guttmacher institute (AGI), a nonprofit organization that conducts research and policy analysis on worldwide reproductive health (and is quoted and respected by both liberal and conservative groups), japan and most western european countries have adolescent pregnancy rates of less than 40 per 1000 (uber-progressive holland shines with only 12 per 1000) numbers in australia, canada, and new zealand are between 40-69. in the united states, we have more than 80 per 1000.

henry j. kaiser family foundation: 25% of girls between 15 and 19 years old describe their first time as "voluntary but unwanted."

"... from the very beginning of their experiences as sexual beings they are conceiving of sex as a performance you give for attention, rather than as something thrilling and interesting you engage in because you want to."

Dilemmas of Desire by Deborah Tolman addresses "silent bodies" (ignoring any sexual arousal)-- didn't have to have sex to feel better, they first and foremost had to be allowed to have sexual feelings
"confused bodies" -- those who can't determine if the emotional wanting and physical excitement they experience is sexual (or anxiety / fear / antsiness)

those these girls didn't experience or had trouble recognizing sexual desire, some of them had experienced sex-- it was something that "just hapened" to many of them. like anne, some didn't really want to, but told their partners they did. others had silent mouths to match their silent bodies and said nothing. tolman points out that "not feeling sexual desire may put girls in danger and 'at risk.' when a girl does not know what her own feelings are, when she disconnects the apprehending psychic part of herself from what is happening in her own body, she then becomes especially vulnerable to the power of others' feelings." simply put, you have to know what you want in order to know what you don't want.

tolman isn't suggesting we should encourage teen girls to run out and have sex, she is saying that we should stop focusing all of our attention on sexual intercourse at the expense of educating our children about sexuality as a larger, more complex, more fundamental part of being human.

why would you take pleasure in seeing a person wear a compromising costume and watching the tedium of her life unfold? because you felt she deserved it. because it was somehow creepily satisfying to see her detached impersonation of wanting, and to see the men's 'desperate' response to it. frailey said she found this 'hilarious'
what is the joke?
the entertainment value has to come from people playing out their roles-- the "women are beautiful and the men are fools!" as sheila nevins put it-- but these roles are beyond reductive. "girls are just girls," frailey said. "now I'm like a guy!" annie felt, in a moment of sexual triumph. but who is this muthological guy we're all trying to b like? wh have we fallen sway to a kind of masculine mystique, determined that to be adventurous is to be like a man, and decided that the best thing we can possibly expect from women is hotness?

candida royalle "we've become a heavily sexualize culture, but it's consumerism and sex rolled into one. revolutionary movements tend to be co-opted-- swallowed up by the mainstream and turned into pop culture. it's a way of neutralizing it, when you think about it... it makes it all safe and palatable, it shuts up the radicals. once that happens, the real power is pretty much dissipated."

if we believed that we were sexy and funny and competent and smart, we would not nee to be like strippers or like men or like anyone other than our own specific, individual selves. that won't be easy, but ultimately it would be no more difficult than the kind of contortions FCPs are constantly performing in an effort to prove themselves. more importantly, the rewards would be the very things female chauvinist pigs want so desperately, the things women deserve: freedom and power.

distinctions between types of prejudice

regarding: 
Prisoners of Hate

"The term 'prejudice' has been loosely use to refer to biased intergroup perceptions, judgments, or attitudes. But it does not always mean the same thing to various scholars who either associate prejudice with cognitive distortions or link it to injustice. The former may be labeled 'cognitive prejudice' and the latter 'moral prejudice.' Cognitive prejudice includes stereotypical judgments of a group, erroneous generalizations, formation of social attitudes despite contradictory objective evidence, and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Moral prejudice consists of the designation of a different set of rights, principles of justice, and judgment of basic value depending on one's social status, race, ethnicity, or other group membership. Of course, moral prejudice generally is based on the same biased thinking as cognitive prejudice, requiring separate explanations. Revenge, which can lead to feuding, may continue long after the original cause of conflict has vanished."
Sun, K. (1993), "Two Types of Prejudice and Their Causes," American Psychologist 48, no 11: 1152-53

Arendt, H., Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil New York: Viking Press, 1963.

Bandura, A., Underwood, B., and . E. Fromson, "Disinhibition of Aggression Through Diffusion of Responsibility and Dehumanization of Victims," Journal of Research in Personality 9 (1975): 253-69.

jus 501 - Michael's notes on Foucault

regarding: 
Discipline and Punish

MICHAEL

Foucault is not a philosopher in the sense of the others read in the curriculum of this class, he is a historian interested primarily in meaning and understanding. The result of this is that he writes about history as though it is literary criticism – which is the only way that one could write about historical “facts”, if one did not believe that “facts” exist. So I would suggest that anyone reading thing this, try to stay away from using statements that suggest superiority or inferiority.

Also, I use some of his language here which includes the “soul”. I should emphasize that Foucault was not a dualist and when he talks about the “soul”, he is typically talking about an intangible sense of the self that only becomes tangible in discourse. That being said…

- Foucault suggests that not only was punishment different during feudal times but that crime itself was as well. Distinctions included:
o Private Property – Prior to the modern-era, most of European societies were mercantile or feudal systems of government, in which private property did not exist to the citizen.
 Private property meant the existence of property crime, which created crimes of desperation.
o Perception of Crime – Because there were no property crimes or crimes of necessity
 People were not as afraid of crime or criminals as much as they are now, even though the rate of crime was roughly the same as it is now.
 Since most crime was violent, criminal acts were seen as indefensible attacks against the sovereign and the society.
o Sovereign Power– The lack of a “judicial system” allowed sovereigns to appoint magistrates at their discretion.
 Lead to corruption by the magistrates
 Allowed for a system of understanding between the magistrates and the peasants regarding crimes and their punishments, which often benefited the peasants.
 Made public punishment significant as retribution was the power of the sovereign, who represented the whole society, punishing the criminal
- Foucault mentions three models of prisons which came about at the beginning of the enlightenment, the last of which -- the Walnut Street Prison (which is actually called the Eastern State Penitentiary), ultimately became the model for our current structure of discipline and punishment.
o Rasphuis at Amsterdam – This prison stressed relationships between the guards and the inmates and allowed the wardens to increase or reduce incarcerations as they saw fit
o Maison de Force at Ghent – Emphasized work due to a prevailing belief that those who committed crimes were “lazy”. The belief was that a physical change was needed for these individuals
o The Walnut Street Prison in Philadelphia – Quaker prison was the first to explicitly target the “soul” as the damaged part of the individual which needed repair. This was done through intense structuring of the day, coerced spiritual guidance and labor, all of which were thought to assist in the “correction” of a damaged soul.

- The enlightenment sought to create “technologies of power”, or systems for ordering and stratifying bodies (meaning both literal bodies as well as metaphysical). Foucault mentions several applications/examples
o Military – In particular Foucault mentions the Prussian military which prided itself on regimentation and discipline.
 Prior to this time, military units had operated in organized masses. However the advent of new war technology had forced tactics to shift towards small, mobile groups operating in cohesion.
• Rather then make the military less regimented; this change resulted in even stricter regulation as forces had to leave to act as a collective.
 One of the ways that order was enforced in this less traditionally structured environment was the creation of additional classes of officers.
• Because units had an endless stratification of higher-ups, soldiers always had someone watching and evaluating their performances.
o Education – Unlike the informal master/apprentice relationship, formalized education was a highly structured environment.
 Formalizing education was thought to assist in formalizing the citizenry themselves and give a unified identity.
• This allowed for the creation of “exams” which, for the first time, established universal standards of “correct” and “incorrect” that could be measured along the way to graduation – not as before where an apprentice merely had to demonstrate his skill once before being expected to take over for the master.
 Students are arranged in an open class room with rows, where an instructor can pass to the side, in front, or behind them. This causes the students to believe that they are always being watched.
o Medicine/Hospitals – Through the construction of more regimented hospitals, in particular with regards to mental health facilities, states were able to create a medical description of what is “normal” with regards to human health and wellness.
 Foucault argues that by developing a hierarchy of terms, individuals were conceived of as a laundry list of illnesses and negatives, rather then by some less tangible notion of the “other”.
 This resulted in the belief that “individualism” was typically aspects of an individual which were relatively undesirable.
o Prison – Foucault invokes the notions of prison popularized by the utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham.
 The Panopticon, is less of an actual prison and more of an idea of prison in which the most important distinction is the change from public punishment to private discipline.
• According to existential thought, no individual can ever truly “know” what another person is thinking. Consequently we attempt to affirm what we believe about ourselves by trying to see how other people see us.
o Think of the concept of “shame” (Sartre). To be ashamed is not to be ashamed of myself, but to be ashamed of how you will now see me.
 The Panopticon design involves a large cylindrical tower in the center of a circular ring of cells. Each cell has a large window facing the tower and the tower itself has windows facing each cell. However the small windows of the tower are too distant for prisoners to see through, while all prisoners can be seen by the individual in the tower.
• The design was to make prisoners always believe that are being watched and evaluated even though the tower has only a minimum number of individuals in it at any time – because the prisoners never know when they are and are not being watched.

- Foucault does not conceive of discipline in the manner we typically do, but rather as a system of empowerment and disembodiment. Furthermore he believes that the reason that these things are not as apparent to us now is that these changes have made any other conception of education, punishment or medicine completely unthinkable to us.
o After the modern period, societies are no longer made of people but of subjects, to be molded according to the whim of those in power, according to the new standards that have been created.

- As it pertains to “punishment”, prison is merely an extension of the same socializing mechanism used in schools. Except when it fails and sends the citizen to prison, it must be reapplied and targeted at the soul.

jus 501 - class' notes on re: transformation of punishment (foucault)

regarding: 
Discipline and Punish

#1. What is Foucault’s argument about the transformation of punishment?

REBECCA

• Foucault first discusses the use of torture as a public spectacle, which he illustrates by the execution of Damiens who attempted regicide in 1757
• Since 19th century, almost universal adoption of the jury system, corrective character of penalty, less physical punishment, disappearance of torture and penalty adapted to individual offender
• The criminal’s body played a key role in penalty but this trend was being phased out as well; “The body of the target of penal repression disappeared” (8).
• “Punishment, then, will tend to become the most hidden part of penal process” (9)
• Punishment became “an economy of suspended rights” (no more pain involved in punishment) and the executioner was replace with “an army of technicians” (11)
• New morality concerning penalty instead of “thousand deaths” (quartering, disembowelment, the wheel, etc) the guillotine: equal for all, “one death per condemned man,” (not cruel), and least shameful (12)
• Use of black veil = condemned man was not to be seen
• By 1830-1848, public executions proceeded by torture were a thing of the past and but the “hold on the body” did not disappear until the mid-19th century
• Pain was replaced by loss of wealth or rights but penalties were still directed at the body (food rations, sexual deprivation, solitary confinement, forced labor)
• New penalty not to punish but to “supervise the individual, neutralize his dangerous state of mind , alter his criminal tendencies and continue even when this change has been achieved” to make offender “not only desirous, but also capable, of living within the law and of providing for his own needs” (18)
• Penal system began judging the soul of the offender rather than the crime
• Penalty not meant to reduce crime but is “linked to a whole series of positive and useful effects” (24)
• Penal system is less a consequence of legal theories than “a chapter of political anatomy” (28)
• Legal proceedings depended on confession through judicial torture
• At times, penalty was a “theatrical reproduction” (45)
• Penalty was as much a political ritual as a judicial ritual- crime is an attack on the sovereign because the laws are his will
o Penalty demonstrates dissymmetry between king and subject who dared violate his laws- a spectacle to show imbalance and excess- “exercise of terror” (49)
o Penalty does not reestablish justice but reactivates power (49) – king’s revenge
• Ceremony of excesses at times took place after death (51)
• Role of the masses ambiguous- witness torture so they will be afraid
o The unintended result was the beginning of social disturbances
o Condemned people became heroes of the masses
• These protests against the “confrontation between the sovereign and the condemned man” (73) led a reform of penalty and the end of the king’s revenge
• Crime became less violent and more an issue of private property and these property offenses were dealt with more sternly
• Varying degrees of penalty also demonstrates to abuses of the monarch
• When punishing one must calculate penalty not in terms of crime but in terms of future disorder and penalty measured in terms of economy not excess (93)
• Six major rules: minimum quantity, sufficient ideality (motive for crime = advantage, effectiveness of penalty = disadvantage), lateral effects (penalty has most profound effects on those that did not commit the crime), perfect certainty (laws published and open legal process), common truth (truth of crime only when completely proven), optimal specification (individualization of sentences)
• Suitable punishment “robs for ever the idea of a crime of any attraction” (104)
• Obstacle-sign constitute new arsenal of penalties must obey several conditions
o As unarbitrary as possible: “the idea of the offense will be enough to arouse the sign of the punishment”- natural consequence. (Vermeil) “those who abuse public liberty…deprived of their own” (105)
 “Power must act while concealing itself beneath the gentle force of nature”
o Complex of sign engage mechanics of force: penalty and disadvantages more lively the crime and its pleasures
 (Mably) “…source of evil” (vagabond-laziness) (106)
 Make penalty something feared (pride led to crime, let it be hurt)
o Duration integrated into economy of penalty (107)- facilitate proper action
 Punish diminishes as it produces effect (chacot, gene, normal)
o Penalty directed above all at potentially guilty (108)
 Penalty natural- retribution that guilty makes to his fellow citizens
 Body of condemned- from property of king to societal property
 (Cahiers) Public works: collective interest and visible/verifiable
o Learned economy of publicity (109) from torture (physical fear/collective horror) to decipherable sign/representation of public morality
 Ceremony of mourning (110)- from festival to school
 Secret punishment wasted (111)- criminal source of instruction
o Inversion of traditional discourse of crime: glory to misfortune (112)
• Reformers criticized imprisonment: incapable of corresponding to specific crime
o No effect on public so it is useless, even harmful to society (costly, causes idleness, multiplies vices) (114)
o Subject to defiance for citizens- obscurity causes suspicion of injustices
o Whole middle between light and death penalty
o Short transformation period
• 4 principle penalties remain in penal code all forms of detention- forced labor, detention, reclusion and imprisonment
• Scaffold replaced by prison with centralized administration (115)
• In <20 years, detention for every offense that did not require death penalty (116)
• Before, natural relation of crime to penalty (117) and security for someone, one does not punish (118) or to secure offenders (those not yet convicted)
o Prison disqualified because bound up with arbitrary, excesses of sovereign- used for philosophers and dissidents
o Counter to individuality of punishment (119) – punishes whole family
• What cause sudden shift to prison? Number of great models
o 1596 Rasphius in Amsterdam (120)- beggars/young malefactors
 Duration- could be reduces based on behavior
 Compulsory work (received wages)
 Strict timetables, obligations, prohibitions, supervision, religious readings link theory and spiritual transformation
o 1749 Ghent in Aloust- idleness caused most crimes
 Benefits: promoted work ethic, reduced taxpayer compensation to owners and number of criminal prosecutions, mass of new workers, true poor to benefit from charity (121)
 Prisoners earned wages & learned trade through compulsory work
 Duration related to length needed for correction
o English models added importance of isolation: provides terrible shock, apprenticeship, spiritual conversion (122)
o Gloucester model: total confinement for most dangerous criminals
o 1790 Philadelphia: continuously reexamined/transformed so not doomed to immediate failure like others (123)
 Constantly employed: defray expenses & to moral/material reform
 Strict timetable, limited solitary, duration based on behavior
 Penalty carried out secretly (124)
 Transformation process between convict and supervisor
 Work on soul: solitude, self-examination, religious exhortation
 Transformation based on knowledge of individual (125)
• Convergence of models: directed toward future (prevent repetition) (126), not to efface crime but to transform criminal, individualize penalties
• Disparity of models: technique of individualizing (instrument of transform) (127)
• Application of penalty to body and soul- instead of obstacle-sign, forms of coercion and schemata of constraint, applied and repeated (128) to restore juridical subject/shape obedient subject by general, detailed form of some power
• Special relationship between punished and punisher (total power free of 3rd party)
o Secrecy and autonomy imperative
o Contrary to 2 aims: citizen participation, render power adequate/ transparent to publicly defined laws (secret punishment not in legal code)
 New power as arbitrary/despotic as before (129)
• Prison=institutionalization of power to punish
• 3 way of organizing power: monarchical, obstacle-sign (130), reformist techniques of individual coercion
• Integral part of new prison system = surveillance and normalization through discipline as well as categorization/documentation
o This is illustrated by the Panopticon- designed for constant surveillance
o Panopticon is perfect exercise of power because “it can reduce the number who exercise it, while increasing the number of those on whom it is exercised” (206)- integrated into any function (medicine, education, production and punishment)- “new political anatomy” (208)
• Discipline is a “whole set of instruments, techniques, procedures, levels of application, target” (215) and “techniques for assuring the ordering of human multiplicities”
• Prisons became self-evident form of punishment for civilized society based on “deprivation of liberty” (232)- prison to pay one’s debts to society = natural
• Imprisonment covered both deprivation of liberties and transformation of criminal
• Complete/austere institutions (prison) = “exhaustive disciplinary apparatus” (235)
• Ideology imagined by reformers: isolation (intimate exchange between convict and power exercised over him), work and prayer (remedy against wandering imagination), prison instrument in modulation of penalty (once reformed, criminal must return to society)
• “Seven universal maxims of the good ‘penitential conditions’”(269)- essential function of transformation of individual’s behavior, convicts isolated/distributed based on gravity of offense (also age, mental attitude, technique of correction and stage of transformation), penalties altered based on individual, work essential element, education of convict crucial, prison supervised by people of moral qualities technical abilities of an educator, and imprisonment followed by measures of assistance/supervision until rehabilitation is complete
• “Crime constitutes a political instrument” (289)
• Carceral system completed in 1840- opening of Mettray (disciplinary form at its most extreme) (293)- inmates had numbers, were taught military exercises, conducted cleanliness inspections, forced work (9 or 10 hours per day), required education, isolation for even minor offenses- it produced bodies that were docile and capable (correctional facility for children)
o Deputies of Mettray were a mixture of judge, teacher, foreman, officer, and parent- lived in close proximity to inmates and rarely left prison
o Undisciplined/dangerous could be normalized through “technical elaboration and rational reflection” (295)
o Prison transformed punitive procedure into penitentiary techniques
 No longer offence but departure from norm
 Made power to punish natural and legitimate (lowered the threshold of tolerance for penalty- appears free of excesses and violence)- “nothing in it that recalls the former excess of sovereign power” (302)
 New form of law: mixture of legality, nature, prescription, constitution and norm
 Capture of body and perpetual observation “examinatory justice”
 Solidity of prisons through reduced utility of crimes and growth of disciplinary networks

cloudy day albums

katri: ian moore's green grass or some flogging molly
kelly: various artists - i wish i were a carpenter: tribute album to the carpenters
rich: arcade fire - neon bible
jeremie: fourtet - rounds

Syndicate content